[nanomsg] Re: Nanomsg status
- From: Schmurfy <schmurfy@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 18:53:54 +0200
Thanks for the details, that's not anything critical so I will see.
On 11 May 2013 17:04, Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to give a shot using nanomsg into a real application as a test
>> but I was wondering what state is it in ? From the code itself pieces
>> seem to fall into pieces well but it is still written alpha everywhere I
>> could see ^^
>>
>> So is it api stable and in a usable state currently ?
>>
>
> The API should be stable, as far as I can see. If there's anything you
> believe is wrong with it, please shout out now rather than later.
>
> As for the implementation, I am currently re-writing the core components
> to become full-blown state machines (see aio2 branch). That should
> ultimately guarantee that the implementation behaves predictably even in
> face of errors, it makes implementing some new features (async DNS
> requests, shmem transport, etc.) more straightforward and it get us rid of
> the internal callback hell that makes developing ZeroMQ so complex.
>
> That being said, I wouldn't use nanomsg for anything critical yet.
>
> Martin
>
Other related posts:
