[nanomsg] Re: NanoMsg ABI compatible with ZeroMQ feature
- From: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 18:48:43 +0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 20/05/14 18:44, John Carneiro wrote:
> I saw this post below online here describing a way to create a
> nanomsg library is fully ABI-compatible with ZeroMQ:
> http://250bpm.com/blog:21
>
> Is this possible with version 0.3 beta, I didn't see a nn_zmq
> method available or a ZMQ_COMPAT defined ?
>
> If not, when would this be available, or has this been deprecated
> and not planned any longer ?
Yes. It have been deprecated.
In early days this was intended to allow for re-use of ZeroMQ language
bindings. We now have native bindings for all common languages.
As for applications, ZeroMQ and nanomsg are not 100% compatible
semantically, so there's not much point in providing ABI compatibility.
Martin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTe4drAAoJENTpVjxCNN9Y/4gH+gOWmzjJKPrB4bNxjnvFLsdN
AwKAYSHFj2y4k/M71zV80U7dXhwv2+yDznb3+LBDQkb6VloNhfSzBX4fIDhpfbl/
KzKBorUt0rXjPEeuH5j1xj/VvODqA7CygKkvf/mKkjed38EeZk1IQsRTuPr8eIPS
H0fhw2SlfMDBU31b5QnyQ4sxiJohSzhlIClHM4SPeS+7QTUt2aCaFsKVboAmSpws
81v3kJlj4vV7qM+x27WMeMuh3vuK+G2hyhfpMvs6NtRKzm2WFOi1koiEcjAOvGZk
Oz5gqQ7BsowJiKPzv7B2rmL3AR2ef5kCZyndHaYSVIYJbWac4K0bS0Q0XEZOFCM=
=5h93
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Other related posts:
