[nanomsg] Re: Moving forward

  • From: Isam Habbab <isam.habbab@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 19:44:24 -0400

I apologize at the outset, I am a newcomer to nanomsg and I am thinking of
using it in my applications as a messaging enabler in a C/C++ financial
application. I have been reading the freelists emails and I would greatly
appreciate it if someone helps me understand the background to the issues
and where  things stand now. If anyone would like to do that privately
without cluttering up the group chats please email me at
isam.habbab@xxxxxxxxx (thanks a lot)

On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Garrett D'Amore <garrett@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > On Mar 18, 2015, at 2:38 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman <dirkjan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 10:20 PM, Garrett D'Amore <garrett@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >> a) Martin suddenly renews his interest and activity in the project, and
> reasserts control and leadership.
> >>
> >> b) The community (working with Martin’s consent), appoints some
> additional leadership, who can be called upon to provide technical
> leadership to keep the project moving forward.  (Indeed, I think this is
> similar to what happened with ØMQ.)
> >>
> >> c)  A new fork is started from nanomsg.
> >
> > I'd like to see (b) happen, where we start by adding you as an
> > additional maintainer for the current nanomsg project (though that
> > would be quite different from how I experienced what happened with
> > 0MQ). If that somehow doesn't happen, I'd certainly consider using
> > your fork for any future projects where I need something nanomsg-like.
> Well, I’m agreeable if we can get Martin engaged.  If not, then I think we
> need to fork.
>         - Garrett

Other related posts: