[nanomsg] Re: Moving forward

  • From: Garrett D'Amore <garrett@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 16:34:32 -0700

> On Mar 18, 2015, at 2:38 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman <dirkjan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 10:20 PM, Garrett D'Amore <garrett@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> a) Martin suddenly renews his interest and activity in the project, and 
>> reasserts control and leadership.
>> b) The community (working with Martin’s consent), appoints some additional 
>> leadership, who can be called upon to provide technical leadership to keep 
>> the project moving forward.  (Indeed, I think this is similar to what 
>> happened with ØMQ.)
>> c)  A new fork is started from nanomsg.
> I'd like to see (b) happen, where we start by adding you as an
> additional maintainer for the current nanomsg project (though that
> would be quite different from how I experienced what happened with
> 0MQ). If that somehow doesn't happen, I'd certainly consider using
> your fork for any future projects where I need something nanomsg-like.

Well, I’m agreeable if we can get Martin engaged.  If not, then I think we need 
to fork. 

        - Garrett

Other related posts: