[nanomsg] Re: Language binding vs custom network protocol implementation
- From: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Garrett D'Amore <garrett@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 09:27:03 +0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 15/09/14 08:31, Matthew Hall wrote:
> What would really be nice would be a description of what was
> learned about the wire protocol to be placed on the nanomsg site
> for detail-obsessed individuals. Some of us could use a spec, even
> if partial or imperfect, to make a version of the protocol for a
> user-mode TCP/IP stack and/or a Wireshark dissector for debugging.
Look into /rfc subdirectory. It contains some specifications you may
find useful.
Martin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUGolHAAoJENTpVjxCNN9YhtYH/1bhVtVGXkokGpbjc7d7E3QO
CqHYTOmo7ilDdqkpE4kS5vaGKA7jvp2IQ4nF70/zIJXrdo/AKtLrtJ9loVp+LL19
VnJ85rJEntlQOHiY3mLK4VD1fhFzAtI+cKuDDn0sgzGP+/5Po6Ft6T44/UUdrGz4
ZPMONT7uGtSRsHGTueJPBtShTwxFLb5yEuTw9OExFkN6kUMjlykJyjlv+lvcCUxp
oZjhVLI9Ofo5qnhS1rs7cuY7Amz2Np17Fudhgq53Gyb2fgsKg5ei7mF8nC2lUm0u
RDelIHeBY7wS2unQg6BadErXMASuRLw3uT8F2hQVA2RpSViMgDSP+pw1zgpT/A4=
=IAaO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Other related posts:
