[nanomsg] Re: Interest for a new scalability protocol

  • From: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 07:33:09 +0200

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I know we've discussed this before, but how so? BUS is modeled to work
is classic multicast scenarios, so everyone in topology should get all
messages except their own.

Martin

On 11/07/14 07:25, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> But BUS doesn't broadcast to everyone.  You wind up kind of
> needing multiple BUS protocols to send out to everyone.  That's the
> big difference between STAR and BUS.  STAR has the nexus resend to
> all peers -- everyone in the topology gets a copy of every message
> (except their own).
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Martin Sustrik
> <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> 
> On 11/07/14 02:09, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>> My star protocol is probably like what you want.  I didn't 
>> implement it in nanomsg but there is an implementation of it in 
>> mangos.  Recall mangos is a new implementation in go that is
>> wire compatible with nanomsg.
> 
> And there's also the BUS protocol in nanomsg...
> 
> Martin
> 
> 
> 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTv3cVAAoJENTpVjxCNN9YUKoH/jig+RGO5hNlqeuwOT1/RRwA
CzMzFSCSZ5rjHGup9QJSUMibvEc33RS0kORQk9pg6oUJcyDP9AP6onbF/QP/OI8Q
a6HJMdywxK1YRoIfwZ2jOKv6MnQ3lYvc1ypfcAnqUQZYx10XYcCbkYb507KSatvL
8KBYq3j7XMWEWcjhQWXqtERZjOT+IvZCWoMtzt0w2j/6hWWDu9R3JgKzafJgfzbc
KOyS7KgkCkJYyOrVV1QAou1EtAKcvhZHoU+N0yuIam4lj0i9z0fOYDKNFJPPfh6j
PmAxQZHUpWqhLJb5mY26bO31Oe66DwNynno7dpz033bQczS5/28+ucvcdNPvHnA=
=6d5z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Other related posts: