[nanomsg] Re: I'm worried about sustrik.
- From: Schmurfy <schmurfy@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 12:57:57 +0100
look like he is not that far: https://twitter.com/sustrik, still tweeting
at least ^^
On 20 January 2014 11:46, Laurent Alebarde <l.alebarde@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> My advice is that people involved in the development add more details in
> the documentation and also some design documents, to help the project
> continue even if Martin is less available. That would significantly help in
> having more contributors and also more users. Candidates for the use of any
> library need visibility, confidence and quick return on invest for the time
> they spend.
>
> Even if nanomsg benefit from the huge experience of Martin and better
> code, it is still a huge effort to get in as a contributor. I have
> discussed here the possibility to add some statefull functionalities to
> finally give up because of the lack of information I could get, and no
> clear point on what the library can do or not.
>
> Without such a documentation level, an alternative would have been to have
> an easy portage of applications between 0MQ and nanomsg. Just a sed and go.
> Then every design and code valid with 0MQ would be valid with nanomsg. But
> nanomsg is a new design, not only a rewrite, so it needs design documents
> to get more audience.
>
> My 2 cts.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Laurent
>
>
>
> Le 20/01/2014 10:36, Michael a écrit :
>
> Good for him if he did. God forbid where else might he be?
>
> crocket <crockabiscuit@xxxxxxxxx> <crockabiscuit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> sustrik hasn't been active for a while.
> I heard a news that he got a job.
> I guess the job requires long workhours.
>
> I hope to see him active soon.
>
>
>
Other related posts:
