I personally do not like TLS for authentication because maintaining TLS certificates has been a nightmare for sysadmins like me. I was pretty much impressed by ZeroMQ authentication when I read pieter's blog articles. I also thought about using ZeroMQ authentication for website logins, but public key authentication looked too complex for ordinary facebook users to use. Do you think secure authentication is a good idea for nanomsg? If it is so, how would you want to implement authentication in nanomsg? On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 14/06/14 11:31, crocket wrote: >> I read about SSL/TLS security in this mailing list before. Which >> security mechanisms do people have in mind? > > The discussion was in context of hop-by-hop encryption of data passed > over TCP connections. > > Martin > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTnBqMAAoJENTpVjxCNN9YyBsH/ilUrlUW8Q2odqf5vaWlRgtA > d+2/tFOcFTngw1Mi0lYa0XFiLvo6TTJypnJcCQdv3MsrCJzrryfTuRiJRnlEqvGM > f3LsUBSjFX4yoqvcB8E039G+GM8frLhpYajg9vlobLyb73vnbjkHFPvw3yAENNNF > ygNoY4Q+oZVZT2ilFJ7ecQt6EVuwUdA0H8fhyuPfAWzxOlGFccUzTPELs4TLZg4+ > yBeq3sUlYoClJVLkQaKqpZpfUIGEEVP0rWk4pC4u6CdhZgoFLMfrDErBGhDUSpO1 > 9zpa1DA2GeITEKGyAU8IkUvwlxbI2lV+Suy25Qr/bIsqkl96h4r5PmoOKiInS3U= > =7pUr > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >