[nanomsg] Re: How is security going to be implemented in nanomsg?
- From: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 14:19:21 +0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 16/06/14 12:59, Drew Crawford wrote:
> There are certainly applications that can fit nicely in these
> requirements. But I think they are primarily, if not entirely,
> enterprise-style messaging applications. So this reinforces what I
> said earlier, that this trajectory leads to being a great
> messaging framework, and not an internet communications library.
Well, yes.
The good news is that no other library is doing better in this respect.
Martin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTnuDJAAoJENTpVjxCNN9YeWgH/RfSXe0N5/3DQtiIYWCl1lpE
9IZewVsZ9TU92itJo+dGgIy8joJ3l4NWbLQAJl2dI5H2gJwsXTH8z9VET/F0nwvX
hC9OInpe6Nl/dRjFe8UNaUtbJoNAoMObaF1D+ric+uMUkaGMJprqCOwZcRcxWZ4O
5FFLJlQ2v6Yqth9FGEodpIrtTrZLxN18w3MWIEAW8qfrekWbTKl0esK7ppRJXU+N
979b7K4dZBIdZ4zavNozHPeN45lzo5GE+1Km5eNaumuw7XvDQciC9s5QI6jKsTLt
PVNaCsZvoZsQ03PLibz6NSNBTlkejW8RmpW8BaxoGR+d6qdtIEg5ieiBmBkIitY=
=otwm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Other related posts:
