[nanomsg] Re: Dealing with the state machines
- From: Paul Colomiets <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 09:42:46 +0200
Hi Martin
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 6:33 AM, Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> One feature that I would like to specifically point out is that
> termination part of the state machine (which tends to be the most
> messy part) is generated automatically with little or no help from the
> programmer.
>
The "generated automatically" thing sounds bold. Do you mean the
"cancel" clause helps? Or there are things, that I've not found by
skimming ocumentation?
> Should we use that to generate nanomsg state machines? Thoughts?
> Ideas? Objections?
>
Given that there are state machine bugs, that nobody fixed for more
than year, I'd say yes it would be nice. The downside is that it would
be almost complete rewrite of nanomsg.
--
Paul
Other related posts:
