[nanomsg] Re: Dead?

  • From: "Jason E. Aten" <j.e.aten@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: nanomsg <nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 06:58:30 -0800

Mangos works beautifully for me. C-nanomsg would intermittently deadlock
for push/pull sockets, which is why I changed to mangos. I don't know if
that deadlock was ever found or fixed. It took running for several hours
for it to happen; not easy to reproduce.

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 6:28 AM, Jay Berg <jaybny@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

my question is, how close/far is nanomsg from mangos? what are the major
issues? is there a subset of nanomsg that is production ready?

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 8:52 AM, Pau Garcia i Quiles <pgquiles@xxxxxxxxxxx


With Martin and Garrett off nanomsg development, I was wondering if it is
sensible to use nanomsg for a new project.

Is there a current maintainer? There has been no commit to the official
repository nor wirebirdlabs' since Garrett decided to give up.

E. g. Jack's commits adding CMake support for Unix builds (something I
have also done, independently), would be nice. At least it would feel

Pau Garcia i Quiles
(Due to my workload, I may need 10 days to answer)

PGP: http://bit.ly/1gjvndi

Other related posts: