[nanomsg] Re: Brief introduction, and pkgconfig vs SONAME question
- From: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 07:36:32 +0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Japheth,
> My name is Japheth Cleaver and, after discovering this project a
> while ago, I've been eager to get the nanomsg project packaged up
> into rawhide for a future Fedora release. (I've somewhat taken over
> for the previous submitter, who's closed their ticket.)
>
> A question was raised in Bugzilla about the pkgconfig version and
> SONAME being so distinct (libnanomsg.pc:2.0.2 vs
> libnanomsg.so.0.2.0). On investigation, I'd assumed this was
> intentional, given the pre-release nature of the ABI... but I
> wanted to make sure it was before submitting package for any
> further review.
>
> (This is the only pending issue (so far) at
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123511, so with luck
> an approval might come sooner rather than later)
>
> Any insight would be appreciated...
Actually, I don't know. This seems to be either a libtool artifact or
a bug in the nanomsg build system.
Correct ABI version is 2.0.2. Where exactly does 0.2.0 come from, I am
nor sure.
Martin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT1zLgAAoJENTpVjxCNN9YgiwIAJu8M8o6rh2Vnyq+B8ubzVlx
x9UrTB/kTmfaMAX8yopqUhYq9dOj3i3cUqye16ScUAS5VWSXycuL7E/owRvk/p1C
4DKDcI0kXMibs2ZlsjVU+SgtRmlFcIIGzluP63jxKm2yI21irktaziFMT4AXsVu4
GACwiyoU6Bwy2PgRhXJZa7bDbwjIqj7mVIHs3O+uQD4SOgRLIq8M8HVFO+IEQKeY
YV3dCu7P7fJvLf33Apu003HjmYoadHIxAGZkDNOU9HGZxD/fXGEWITPavMctG/ll
LEMkOCaXsIABrfogMo74n45yx28VxP7GJkgRmyt4l8FxVxyRBpUfm3nAXMfcNPM=
=JvUD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Other related posts:
