[nama] Re: jack-session

  • From: Philipp Überbacher <hollunder@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: nama <nama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:14:46 +0200

Excerpts from alex stone's message of 2010-10-26 12:38:25 +0200:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Philipp Überbacher
> <hollunder@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Excerpts from alex stone's message of 2010-10-26 11:42:52 +0200:
> >> Joel, I've read on the site that nama has ladish support, but i ask if
> >> Torben's jack-session (jack1) is being considered now or in the
> >> future?
> >>
> >> Alex.
> >
> > jack-session would need to be implemented in ecasound. Torben had a look
> > at it, and it would be possible but not trivial, afair. I'd appreciate
> > it if you could get Torben to do it :)
> >
> >
> >
> 
> I don't think i'd have any more luck than anyone else!
> I've mentioned qwerty bindings once too often i think, and Torben's
> door has shut.... :)
> 
> Alex.

I just think it would help if he'd hear it from more users. I'm pretty
much out of the loop currently and don't know whether there was progress
on the jack-session front in the meanwhile. From what I remember the
necessary change to ecasound would get rid of some of ecasounds
jack limitations as well.


Other related posts: