[nama] Re: (admin) Replies to sender vs. replies to list

  • From: "S. Massy" <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: nama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 14:16:40 -0400

On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 01:54:39PM -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
> Hi Namites and Namacologists,
> Currently replies default to the list. 
> I'm considering changing that to reply to sender,
> to avoid private mails unintentially going to the list.
No objection. When I restarted using mailing lists extensively a few
years ago, I found it very irksome, since I had grown accustomed to a
simple reply going to the whole list (which was the standard ca.
2000-2003), but I'm used to it by now and I can see that it has its
uses. Besides, it makes sense to fall in with what seems to be the
modern standard.

Other related posts: