[nama] Re: Thoughts about Nama's organisational features

  • From: "S. Massy" <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: nama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 18:55:18 -0400

On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 12:11:12PM -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
> > What we might need:
> > - I could have sworn show used to list tracks below the buss they belong
> >   to, but it doesn't seem to be the case. 
> Yes, I wrote this before. There are two track listing
> modes, numerical and by bus. I think by bus-listing kicks
> in when there are a large number of tracks.
> It was horrible code, which means that's a good
> reason to review it some time.
Good to know I didn't make it up. :)


Other related posts: