Hello Joel1Me too, don't cache the fades. You have given a good reason, when you were talking about CPU-usage, another good one is flexibility. A use-case for it is this: apply fades to a vocal track, to not catch the noise in between passages and make good use of a compressor, which also should not try to compress long periods of just quiet noise. Then you apply a delay. With fades first, it's no problem: The original source material is silenced when necessary, the compressor behaves and because the delay sits after the fade, its echos are heard clearly. - If you don't apply the fade in this situation, you will get a cut-echo or you shift the delay and you will get a full echo, but also - very possibly - noise raised to a certain degree - or a cough. :-)
Warmly yours Julien 050e010d0f12010401-0405-0d09-030f12011a0f0d- Such Is Life: Very Intensely Adorable; Free And Jubilating Amazement Revels, Dancing On - FLOWERS! ******** Find some music at ******** http://juliencoder.de/nama/music.html --------------------------------------------------------------- "If you live to be 100, I hope I live to be 95 and 37 days, so I can be sure, there's someone at your site, who loves you." (Not Winnie the Puh)