> -----Original Message----- > From: muscle-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:muscle-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marius Kjeldahl > Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 12:10 AM > To: muscle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: marius@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [muscle] Server design > > > 1) Server design. Should I plan on extending the muscled > daemon, adding my own > authentication layer and session logic, or would it be just > as good just to > have a "server" as a separate process to another muscled > process, where my > "server" (typically running centrally under my control) would > take care of > controlling which messages gets distributed to what clients > through the > muscled daemon? I would say the MUSCLE is more like framework. You should use as much as possible the original code and implement your specific features over the existing classes. I wouldn't say you need another process, but another thread is very wise in my opinion. You could read sources for BeShare (sample implementation of chat client using MUSCLE as the framework). > > 2) Has anybody added SSL transport support? > > 3) Anywhere I can look for more documentation or application examples? BeShare you can download from http://www.bebits.com/. It has sources included. There is compatible client for Linux and Windows too. > > Thanks in advance, > > Marius Kjeldahl > Mika T. Lindqvist FieldNet Association