[muscle] Re: MUSCLE in public downloadable repository?

  • From: "Mika Lindqvist" <linki@xxxxxxx>
  • To: <muscle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 10:34:25 +0300

I think the main problem is what Jeremy and Vitaliy have already noted. =
We
would need one new public CVS server for just one new "project" and that
wouldn't be cost-efficient. Using existing public or semi-public CVS =
servers
like SourceForge is a bad thing too because of the different sync times =
of
anonymous (read-only) and developer (read-write) repositories.

Mika T. Lindqvist
FieldNet Association

> -----Original Message-----
> From: muscle-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx=20
> [mailto:muscle-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David Svanberg
> Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 10:45 AM
> To: muscle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [muscle] MUSCLE in public downloadable repository?
>=20
>=20
> Hey, by the way, why can't MUSCLE reside in a "public" CVS repository?
>=20
> Wouldn't that be pretty nice?
>=20
> Cheers,
> David Svanberg
> Software Engineer  Poseidon Simulation AS
> Naeringsparken, P.O.Box 89, N-8376 Leknes, Norway
> Tel:+47 760 54 330  Fax:+47 760 82 006
> E-mail:ds@xxxxxxxxxxx  www.poseidon.no
>=20
> POSEIDON - your maritime training partner
> =20
>=20



Other related posts: