[muscle] Re: MUSCLE in public downloadable repository?

  • From: "Jeremiah Bailey" <drimmeeper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: muscle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 17:53:43 GMT

Maybe someone could setup a CVS server with the muscle source and have 
one or more people in charge of syncing with the main code base.

My 2 bits...
Jeremiah Bailey

> Hi David,
> 
> LCS maintains the muscle source on our private CVS server, along with 
> a l=
> ot of=20
> other closed-source LCS code.  I could ask my sysadmin about allowing
> =20
> anonymous read-only access to the muscle repository if you like, but 
> I'm =
> not=20
> sure if it's possible to allow that for just one repository (and I am 
> sur=
> e=20
> they wouldn't want to allow anonymous access to the rest of our 
> sources! =
> =20
> :^)).  I'm also not clear as to what the advantages of read-only CVS 
> acce=
> ss=20
> would be over just downloading and unzipping the latest released 
> muscle.z=
> ip=20
> file.  Perhaps you can describe what benefits you see in having CVS 
> acces=
> s?
> 
> Jeremy
> 
> >Hey, by the way, why can't MUSCLE reside in a "public" CVS 
> > repository?
> >
> >Wouldn't that be pretty nice?
> >
> >Cheers,
> >David Svanberg


Other related posts: