[muscle] Re: MUSCLE and compiler issues

  • From: "Mika Lindqvist" <linki@xxxxxxx>
  • To: <muscle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 06:50:00 +0300

QMessageTransceiverThread.cpp still uses QEvent::MaxUser which wasn't
defined in Qt 2.3.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: muscle-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:muscle-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jeremy Friesner
> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 7:08 PM
> To: muscle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [muscle] Re: MUSCLE and compiler issues
> 
> 
> Hi Mika,
> 
> > I just wanted to know what is your opinion of adding (optional) 
> > "parent" parameter to QAcceptSocketsThread and 
> > QMessageTransceiverThread, because I have had odd crash issues with 
> > VC6/Qt 2.3 and it would be more consistent with the other code if I 
> > could pass it with the constructors. It would change the 
> order of the 
> > destruction of the classes, but I think normally with Qt it 
> should be 
> > reversed anyways (childs after parent).
> 
> I think that is a good idea.  I've made the changes and they 
> will be in the next release -- in the meantime I'll send you 
> the changed files so you can test/use them.



Other related posts: