What about Kelvin's scale? It is the most logical of the lot. Not only does his use a logical scale (100 units between freezing point and boiling point of H2O... vs. 180 for the one used by our not-so-efficient neighbOrs to the south), but it also dispenses with the need for negative values! Admittedly, remembering 0 for freezing point of water is a lot easier than 32 or 273.15 (rather relevant to human-kind since we kind of die with prolonged exposure to sub-0 temperatures). PS Technically Kelvin is the preferred SI unit for temperature though Celsius is of more practical value in every-day use because of the freezing point of water. Found a site that will prove useful in the coming month... (I've been playing with SI units for 17 years now and I still am sometimes caught off-guard as to what exactly is proper format): http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/checklist.html Eric. on 29/7/03 12:06 PM, Eurogarth at eurogarth@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Perhaps not so "more sensible" after all. > > ;-) Garth > > http://www.astro.uu.se/history/celsius_scale.html > > > >> If you think F was stupid for measurements how about Celcius. When it began >> the >> idiot had water boiling at Zero degrees and freezing at 100 degrees. Many >> years >> later a more sensible scholar decided it would be better to switch it around >> so it >> froze at the cold temperature and boiled at the hotter. But then again this >> was >> the beginning of metric. _________________________________________________ For information concerning the MUGLO List just click on http://muglo.on.ca/pages/members.html#Joinmuglo Don't forget to periodically check our web site at: http://muglo.on.ca/