Eric D. wrote: >Exactly where I'm moving in three months :) > Might I ask where to? I know most of England very well & may be able to give you neat places to see, or drink & eat at. I will be in the UK in September for 3 weeks. >I was also stunned to find out that the UK still uses miles for distance (all >the UK-based map sites use miles and those British cop shows show speeds in >MPH). > maybe, but the best map atlas show in both & a lot of road signs show both; a poor way of making a slow change. The fast change from the original Pounds, Shillings and Pence to a metric equivalent was quick & successful. >I wish the damned shops would use kg as their prominent units rather than >lbs. Bananas for $.29/lbs or $.69/kg are about the only prices I know in kg;). >Maybe I should start harassing store managers to let them know my >dissatisfaction with the lbs-preferred state of affairs! > Agreed in spades! >I just find it so funny -- the metric system is now nearly 200 years old and >it is *undeniably* the better measurement system (I can't think of a single >*advantage* to imperial that is not rooted in tradition), yet a number of >countries still haven't made a full switch (plus, imperial is a cost on >business -- it's illogical to have 12 inches to a foot but only 3 feet to a >yard). > >Eric. > > > It's not really illogical if you know the history. Your thumb averages 1" from nail to knuckle & your foot is 12 inches with boots on. 3 feet to a yard is an easy measure, although an average pace is 3 feet, all measures stemming from the Army's need to be pretty consistent without carrying "yardsticks". I totally agree that Metric is better. TTFN, TeeC _________________________________________________ For information concerning the MUGLO List just click on http://muglo.on.ca/pages/members.html#Joinmuglo Don't forget to periodically check our web site at: http://muglo.on.ca/