[muglo] Re: Constitution and attendance

  • From: Tee Cashmore <teecashmore@xxxxxx>
  • To: muglo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 09:33:56 -0400

On Mar 8, 2009, at 9:02 PM, Doug Bale wrote:
> ...if someone who isn't attending meetings is also not reading the  
> e-mails... because the e-mail address they've given us is no long  
> operative,

If their e-mails are not reaching them as they have changed  
addresses, isp etc., would Doug not get
such e-mails returned as "undeliverable? Therefore it would be  
relatively easy to denote the number of members. A time limit for a  
reply is often defined in a Motion, in which case a simple majority  
of those members would work; still fairly large numbers.  
Alternatively members could be notified of any online vote & have to  
send a simple "registration" of intent to vote.
MUGLO information at <http://www.freewebs.com/muglo>
Manage your account options at <http://www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi>

Other related posts: