[muglo] Re: Constitution

  • From: Bob McDaniel <rmcdaniel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: muglo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 01:13:04 -0500

See the following for a statement of Roberts Rules of Order, Para 64, 
Quorum

http://www.robertsrules.org/rror-11.htm#64

While I cannot find the phrase "50% plus one" in Roberts, I see no 
objection to using it. It would obviously make it easier to achieve a 
quorum. Perhaps, Tee, you could post the relevant paragraph from 
Roberts.

Bob

On 5-Mar-09, at 11:21 PM, Tee Cashmore wrote:
>
> On Mar 5, 2009, at 7:26 PM, Bob McDaniel wrote:
>> I'd suggest that the quorum be set at 15,
>
> The Constitution 8.0 states that "Roberts Rules
> of Order" shall apply. All the many committees that
> I have served on us "50% plus one". That means that
> a Quorum should be 11 if you include only physical
> meetings or 42 if all active members are included.
> TeeC
>

---
MUGLO information at <http://www.freewebs.com/muglo>
Manage your account options at <http://www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi>



Other related posts: