[muglo] Constitution

  • From: Ralph and Joan Winfield <jrwinfield@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: Muglo <muglo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 22:38:43 -0500

I'm certainly glad to see somebody that pays attention to grammar and 
spelling. Good work.

In #5, shouldn't it be "a quorum" instead of "quorums"?

Joan



On Mar 4, 2009, at 8:26 PM, Doug Bale wrote:

5. The proposed amendment to Article 4.0, needs a further tweak. With 
the amendment, its first sentence would read “Quorums of the MUGLO 
membership shall consist of the MUGLO membership, provided that at 
least two weeks’ notice is given to the MUGLO membership that a voting 
process will be performed on the MUGLO list.” That is to say that no 
fewer than 100 per cent of members will constitute a quorum; an 
impossible requirement to meet.

I move an amendment to make the Article 4.0 read simply “Quorums of the 
MUGLO membership for voting purposes shall consist of a simple majority 
of those voting on any given issue, provided that at least two weeks’ 
notice is given to the membership that a vote is to be held on the 
issue in question.”
---
MUGLO information at <http://www.freewebs.com/muglo>
Manage your account options at <http://www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi>



Other related posts: