[mpegaudsg] Re: SSC related request wrt MPEG-4 Part 26
- From: Schuyler Quackenbush <srq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Oomen, Werner" <werner.oomen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 09:17:16 -0400
Hi Werner,
I agree that these are editorial changes and so I think it would be fine
to remove the table.
Best,
Schuyler
---
Dr. Schuyler Quackenbush, Audio Research Labs
336 Park Ave, Suite 200, Scotch Plains, NJ 07076
office: 908 490 0700 srq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mobile: 908 612 9423
fax: 908 842 9151 www.audioresearchlabs.com
Oomen, Werner wrote:
Dear Audio subgroup,
While reviewing N10395 (MPEG-4 part 26, audio conformance, 87th MPEG), Ralph
Sperschneider found that there are no crosses in Table 90e (SSC Profile).
We had a closer look into this and found that this table entry was inherited
from ISO_IEC_14496-4:2004/Amd.13:2007 (conformance for a.o. High Quality
Parametric Coding).
At the time of writing the WD for Amd13, the assumption was that an SSC Profile
would be defined in MPEG-4 Part 3 in due time. This however never happened.
Consequently, it is proposed to remove this table as an editorial change. In addition to removing
the table, in clauses 7.19.2.2 and 7.19.2.3 the occurrences of "SSC Profile decoder" need
to be replaced by "decoder supporting the SSC Object Type".
Are there any objection to perform these changes as editorial?
Best regards,
Frans de Bont / Werner Oomen
The information contained in this message may be confidential and legally
protected under applicable law. The message is intended solely for the
addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any use, forwarding, dissemination, or reproduction of this message is
strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient,
please contact the sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the
original message.
Other related posts:
