I appreciate your comments, Robert. Thanks a lot. I'm with you on the branch clutter. Later last evening I went through the 50 or so shots I'd taken and came up with a couple more. Although it's blown out in spots, I like DSC_0935 much better as a singing shot because it's way less cluttered. Thanks again. Jay I like DSC_0929 because it's a better diagnostic shot, showing more hood and back. On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Robert Smith <rsmithent@xxxxxxx> wrote: > I like both of these - though the first one (in the poorer light) seems > better to me because the limbs frame the bird rather than protrude from the > background. I heard one of these guys Friday, but he never came out of the > oak limbs to pose for me! Congrats on a cool bird! > > Robert Smith > 336-339-3497 > rsmithent@xxxxxxx > www.photobiologist.com > > > >> Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 19:05:11 -0500 >> Subject: [missbirdphotos] Re: Hooded warbler >> From: jcliburn@xxxxxxxxx >> To: Missbirdphotos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> >> I went back this evening and got him in different light. >> >> On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 1:08 PM, J. K. Cliburn <jcliburn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Got this about an hour ago or so. Comments and criticism welcome. >> > >> > Jay
Attachment:
DSC_0935-20120331-800x600.jpg
Description: JPEG image
Attachment:
DSC_0929-20120331.jpg
Description: JPEG image
