[mira_talk] Re: specifying working directory without actually cd'ing into it?
- From: Evan <evan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: mira_talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 09:32:26 -0800
Sven, the ability to use the cwd parameter at all is to limit the manual
changes to my assembly scripts and just set it up to be aware of a
particular directory structure. And the talk about relative paths would be
the easiest way to do this (without referencing the $PWD variable or the
output of the `pwd` command)
~Evan
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Sven Klages
<sir.svencelot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> Just curious, ... what is the reason that you really need relative paths?
>
> cheers,
> Sven
>
>
> 2011/12/22 Evan <evan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>> Bastien, do you know what version relative paths were implemented? Or
>> could you verify that since the --cwd parameter was implemented that it was
>> capable of relative paths?
>>
>> Relative paths are all I was hoping for in 2012. (I can live without
>> directories with spaces).
>>
>> And lastly for clarification / historic purposes do you know if having a
>> space in the output of `pwd` will cause problems even if the argument to
>> --cwd is a relative path?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Evan
>>
>>
Other related posts:
