[mira_talk] Re: Problem with Paired 454, MP Illumina, MIRA and Bambus
- From: Bastien Chevreux <bach@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: mira_talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 10:39:45 +0200
On Jul 6, 2011, at 23:19 , Nestor Zaburannyi wrote:
> I have 454 paired data and Illumina Mate-Pair data. It took me some time to
> figure out that not the Bambus is wrong... Long story short:
Actually I am not so sure that Bambus is correct :-)
One thing to keep in mind are the orientation of the pairs and what the
scaffolder expects:
- Sanger pairs are oriented like this: ------> <-------- and that is what
Bambus wants per default
- 454 pairs are originally oriented like this: --------> ---------> but
as scaffolders (and MIRA) originally did not expect that, I use a trick by
letting sff_extract reverse one sequence so that everything as back to
"normal". Nowadays MIRA could also use the forward / forward orientation, but I
had not time to change sff_extract.
- Illumina paired-end reads look like this: --------> <--------- ...
which makes it easy.
- Illumina mate-pairs look like this: <--------- ----------> ... which
again lets scaffolders like Bambus despair as the expect something different.
MIRA does not care there, it can work with that, too.
> Most of the contigs are not joined properly and we get hundreds of thousands
> "Invalid" links with consistent distance between them. Something like:
Which is a symptom of what I described: mate-pairs are facing outwards, Bambus
expects them to face inwards.
There is no easy solution to this, the simplest one I can think of is to
reverse all reads of the Illumina mate-pair set (both sets!) and then assemble.
Should keep Bambus happy.
Hope that helps,
Bastien
--
You have received this mail because you are subscribed to the mira_talk mailing
list. For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe, please visit
http://www.chevreux.org/mira_mailinglists.html
Other related posts:
- » [mira_talk] Problem with Paired 454, MP Illumina, MIRA and Bambus- Nestor Zaburannyi
- » [mira_talk] Re: Problem with Paired 454, MP Illumina, MIRA and Bambus- Robin Kramer
- » [mira_talk] Re: Problem with Paired 454, MP Illumina, MIRA and Bambus- WATSON Mick
- » [mira_talk] Re: Problem with Paired 454, MP Illumina, MIRA and Bambus- Robin Kramer
- » [mira_talk] Re: Problem with Paired 454, MP Illumina, MIRA and Bambus - Bastien Chevreux
- » [mira_talk] Re: Problem with Paired 454, MP Illumina, MIRA and Bambus- Bastien Chevreux
- » [mira_talk] Re: Problem with Paired 454, MP Illumina, MIRA and Bambus- WATSON Mick
- » [mira_talk] Re: Problem with Paired 454, MP Illumina, MIRA and Bambus- Nestor Zaburannyi
- » [mira_talk] Re: Problem with Paired 454, MP Illumina, MIRA and Bambus- Surya Saha
- » [mira_talk] Re: Problem with Paired 454, MP Illumina, MIRA and Bambus- Nestor Zaburannyi
- » [mira_talk] Re: Problem with Paired 454, MP Illumina, MIRA and Bambus- Surya Saha
- » [mira_talk] Re: Problem with Paired 454, MP Illumina, MIRA and Bambus- Nestor Zaburannyi
- » [mira_talk] Re: Problem with Paired 454, MP Illumina, MIRA and Bambus- Robin Kramer
- » [mira_talk] Re: Problem with Paired 454, MP Illumina, MIRA and Bambus- Surya Saha
- » [mira_talk] Re: Problem with Paired 454, MP Illumina, MIRA and Bambus- WATSON Mick
- » [mira_talk] Re: Problem with Paired 454, MP Illumina, MIRA and Bambus- Evan
- » [mira_talk] Re: Problem with Paired 454, MP Illumina, MIRA and Bambus- Juan Daniel Montenegro Cabrera
- » [mira_talk] Re: Problem with Paired 454, MP Illumina, MIRA and Bambus- Robin Kramer
- » [mira_talk] Re: Problem with Paired 454, MP Illumina, MIRA and Bambus- Bastien Chevreux