sff_extract trims of the first however many bases, in the least sophisticated way. sffinfo finds the adapters. There is a big difference in the resultant assembly. sffinfo still isn't perfect though. Sincerely yours, Robin On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Bastien Chevreux <bach@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Jul 14, 2011, at 21:32 , Peter Cock wrote: > > On Thursday, July 14, 2011, Robin Kramer <kodream@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> You should really use sffinfo, sff_extract doesn't clean the sequences. > > What do you mean? Both Roche sffinfo and sff_extract can give you > > the trimmed or untrimmed sequences as defined in the SFF file. > > Exactly the question which came to my mind. > > Robin? > > B. > > > -- > You have received this mail because you are subscribed to the mira_talk > mailing list. For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe, please > visit http://www.chevreux.org/mira_mailinglists.html >