Hello Bastien, I have used Mira 3.02 with the following parameters ./bin/mira -project=crypto -job=mapping,genome,accurate,solexa COMMON_SETTINGS -GE:kcim=yes -AS:sd=yes -SK:not=8 SOLEXA_SETTINGS -LR:ft=fastq -CL:qc=yes -CL:qcmq=25 -GE:tismin=300:tismax=900 Except for the late presence of the rail-reads, is there any mistake in the assembly I should be aware of? And, most important, those "deletions" in the regions not covered by any read, should I trust it once there are so many of them? could it be a problem in the sequencing instead of the program? Regards ---------------- s. On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Bastien Chevreux <bach@xxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > On Montag 26 Juli 2010 Saulo Alves wrote: > > Hello Bastien, > > As you can see there are regions covered exclusively by the rail-reads > and > > the reference sequence. > > > Well, clear thing: none of your reads covers the given position in the > contig. > The "railreads" you should not see at all, except in intermediate results. > > I conclude that you are using some older version of MIRA where I forgot to > switch off the output of rail reads. Please switch to a newer version, > 3.0.5 > or 3.2.0rc1 (not rc2, I just discovered a regression there). > > Best, > Bastien > > -- > You have received this mail because you are subscribed to the mira_talk > mailing list. For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe, please > visit http://www.chevreux.org/mira_mailinglists.html >