[mira_talk] Re: How does Mira determine quality scores?
- From: Bastien Chevreux <bach@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: mira_talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 21:24:22 +0200
On Donnerstag 30 Juli 2009 Davide Sassera wrote:
> [...]
> I would love to try a version with this algorithm, so for once I can
> help instead of just using the software.
> I cannot guarantee on how fast I will be able to give you some results
> as I'm very busy, but I'll do my best.
http://www.chevreux.org/tmp/mira_3rc1b1_dev_linux-gnu_x86_64_static.tar.bz2
I'm putting some last finishing touches on version 3 in the next two weeks, if
I hear back from you before release that the base calling gets better I'll
include that change :-)
> Reasoning from another point of view, couldn't Mira give quality score
> to gaps also? it could either be a fixed number or something like the
> mean value of the two bases around the gap?
> maybe this does not make sense, what do you think?
Ummm ... MIRA already does exactly this?! At least it's intended to do so and
from I what I can see after a quick check in the unpadded fasta of a test
project, it does.
Where are you missing the quality value for the gap?
Regards,
Bastien
--
You have received this mail because you are subscribed to the mira_talk mailing
list. For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe, please visit
http://www.chevreux.org/mira_mailinglists.html
Other related posts:
