[mira_talk] Re: CNAG
- From: Tony Travis <a.travis@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: mira_talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 21:15:12 +0000
On 25/03/11 20:15, Bastien Chevreux wrote:
[...]
Then there's another problem: just one of the 8x coverage libraries
(which would be by far not enough anyway) of 1.8 gb with 36bp reads
represents ~450m reads! Not really much less than 800m reads.
If I made my calculations right, the whole data set has something like
1.8 to 2 billion reads.
Hi, Bastien.
Sorry, I was thinking about insert coverage, not read coverage...
I've now checked the number of reads in the actual dnGASP data files
and, of course, your calculations are right ;-)
Bye,
Tony.
--
Dr. A.J.Travis, University of Aberdeen, Rowett Institute of Nutrition
and Health, Greenburn Road, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB21 9SB, Scotland, UK
tel +44(0)1224 712751, fax +44(0)1224 716687, http://www.rowett.ac.uk
mailto:a.travis@xxxxxxxxxx, http://bioinformatics.rri.sari.ac.uk
--
You have received this mail because you are subscribed to the mira_talk mailing
list. For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe, please visit
http://www.chevreux.org/mira_mailinglists.html
Other related posts:
