On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Bastien Chevreux <bach@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ** > > On Monday 15 August 2011 19:36:32 Iddo Friedberg wrote: > > > Oops. I put up the wrong logfile. The run was definitely not on an NFS > > > system > > > Heavens! Is there any valid reason you set up an assembly with a coverage > >= 1000x ? No, not ten, not one hundred ... one thousand! You are aware that > this actually decreases the quality of a genome assembly, right? Non-random > errors in the sequencing will be the death of it. > > > You might want to read quickly through > > > http://mira-assembler.sourceforge.net/docs/DefinitiveGuideToMIRA.html#sect_seqadv_a_word_or_two_on_coverage > > > especially the small paragraph labelled with a nice, warm and re-assuring > "Warning". > > > Back to your project: slash down the amount of data by a factor of ten and > all will be well :-) > > > B. > > > PS: and I'm actually now thinking of adding another warning flag which will > let MIRA stop if it detects a coverage >= 150x in genome de-novo ... anyone > having an oppinion on this? > > > > Seems like I should be the strongest supporter of this proposal ;) -- Iddo Friedberg http://iddo-friedberg.net/contact.html