Steve, here's one of the better write ups on the Si570. http://www.cliftonlaboratories.com/si570_kit_from_k5bcq.htm Though it is about a specific kit, it deals with the performance of the Si570 very well. I am going to open a new page on the Si570 on the wiki. - f On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 6:57 AM, Steve VK2SJA <vk2sja@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi chaps, > > Spurred on (sorry, sad pun intended) by Rick LU9DA's problem in obtaining > the Si570 in Argentina I've been doing some reading. > > Here is Hans Summers write-up on the Si750 vs DDS feature set. Well worth > a read:- > > http://www.hanssummers.com/ddssi570.html > > Analog Devices have an online software design tool that you can use to > model the output of their various DDS chips. Which obviously I'm not > driving correctly. Because I'm seeing pretty pictures that look a whole > lot cleaner than real world Amateurs are reporting ;-) I think the trick > might be to click the link option "View Tabular Display of Spurs". But if > one could learn to drive this tool properly and trust the predictions it > looks like it could be useful:- > > http://designtools.analog.com/dtDDSWeb/dtDDSMain.aspx > > Gérard F6EHJ, has done some work with DDS and has some details and a > pretty picture of a AD9850's (80Mhz version) output at 32Mhz. Actually, > it's not particularly pretty. > > http://www.f6blk.net/main_en.php?page=77 > > My impression is that you might be able to use a DDS for this application > but that it would have to be at least a AD9851 or preferably better to get > anything like reasonable results. I suspect that the really cheap Chinese > AD9850 module just isn't going to cut it. And once you buy a DDS chip that > will cut the mustard it is going to cost more than the Si570 anyway. > > Still, doesn't hurt to experiment and the software is the easy part. > > Sad really. Because I've got a box full of them too! > > 73, Steve > > > > > > > > > > > >