[microworld-dev] Re: MoM Saturday August 14th
- From: "saideep a.v.s" <annadatha@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: microworld-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 21:46:01 +0530
Hello all,
We also wanted to know of the status of defect no 7 working by Kumar
Gaurav. and the unit tests taken by Soundarya.
If soundarya is busy.. can any of the others from test team help with the
unit testing?
Best Wishes,
Saideep Annadatha
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Saurabh Bhatia <saurabh.a.bhatia@xxxxxxxxx
> wrote:
> *MoM Saturday August 14th , Attendees : Saideep , Chandra , Saurabh
>
> First of all Happy Independence Day and Jai Hind to all !
> **
> Saideep Suggested that we could shift the meeting to Wednesday Night. We
> can pass votes and take a common decision as to *
> *what should be an ideal day for meeting.
> We then discussed the current open issues one by one
> *: lets speak
> lets check issues first
> saideep: maybe we must shift this meet to Wednesday nites
> saideep: yea
> starting with 3?
> me: yes
> Refund i guess we can close
> saideep: hey that refund thing
> we can close
> yess
> me: ok
> 9:37 PM we didnt have any issues
> in the live deployment too
> saideep: cool then, go ahead, close the isse
> issue*
> me: ok done
> 9:38 PM next
> upload issue
> saideep: Image upload error.. I am working still
> me: ok
> next
> 9:39 PM saideep: Unit tests.. who is working on it:?
> me: i m not sure who
> soundarya was supposed to do it, but no updates yet
> Please update the list and repository if done.
>
> saideep: hey Issue no 7
> was taken up by someone..lemmecheck
> 9:42 PM Kumar Gaurav
> me: yess
> i think he has worked upon it
> saideep: then where is the build?
> me: he asked me to add him to
> saideep: i mean there was no push/commit from him
> me: mworld.heroku.com
>
> * Hey Kumar, let me know about the issue7*
>
> * Adding Account Number *- *Automating the Account Number Generation
> *
>
> chandramouli: need account column
> me: 10
> saideep: one min let me chk
> chandramouli: http://github.com/saurabhbhatia/microworld/issues#issue/10
> me: chandra discussed
> it
> 9:51 PM ok
> replying to your query
> chandra
> generally it
> first of all did you get the full concept of
> groups
> chandramouli: I havn't got the idea of group and individual yet...
> me: okkk
> nice
> i will tell you now
> 9:52 PM chandramouli: ok
> me: what happens is
> in realtime
> we have a slum where we run this program
> there 20 people have signed up for this program
> each of them is the idividual
> 9:53 PM each person who enrolls for our program
> is an individual
> getting ?
> chandramouli: yes
> me: okk
> next
> 9:54 PM groups
> chandramouli: I have a doubt with how the accounts are managed
> me: okk
> 1 min
> chandramouli: ok
> me: let me finish
> then we goto next
> chandramouli: ok
> me: thing
> we have
> 9:55 PM divided these people into self help groups
> based on their comfort level
> chandramouli: ok
> me: eg one group has all the tamil people
> and they are comfortable sticking
> chandramouli: ok
> me: together
> ok the idea of the group is
> evey sat and sunday
> 9:56 PM they sit together
> and discuss how their savings can be
> used
> and how group could facilitate that
> like bulk ration
> chandramouli: ok
> me: can help them getting it cheaper
> saideep: you mean that is done in group wise?
> me: yess
> discussion
> saideep: yea
> 9:57 PM me: yeah
> its a group activity
> saideep: then who would be their to tell them to which group they belong?
> me: they have decided themselves
> chandramouli: they decide
> me: right
> they named their groups
> themselves
> 9:58 PM saideep: okie
> me: ok the idea is to extend this
> as a loaning system at a later point
> chandramouli: ok
> me: thats the group has to be there
> okie
> next accounting
> please put up the query
> 9:59 PM have you understood the groups btw
> chandramouli: my question is that the individual acounts are the only
> true accounts, the grouping is only for convenience?
> 10:00 PM saideep: nope.. I see that those are related to the groups
> me: right saideep is right
> so
> if i am a member of group one
> the account name is assigned as
> 101
> saideep: can a person belong to two different groups?
> me: 102
> nope
> 10:01 PM 1 person can belong to only one group
> and the group does not change
> at the moment
> at least
> saideep: hmm.. then we can do in this way: have a groups table
> 10:02 PM chandramouli: The money into individual accounts gets credited
> when they deposit as individuals and gets debited when the individual
> withdraws money or when a group activity cost the individual some Rs. X, it
> is automatically debited ....
> saideep: and a members table as well.. where a user is mapped to a group
> and also has an account number in tat table
> both can happen
> right?
> *
> *
> *Post this, we held a voice conference over skype*,* Points discussed
> during the conf were :*
>
>
> - Explain Groups in Detail
> - How Accounts , Individuals and Groups are related to each other
> - Write a Model to Generate Account Number for each person.
> - Formula for generation --> Group Number X 100 + 1 and auto
> increment
>
> Please add if i am missing anything guys.
>
> Regards
>
> Saurabh
>
Other related posts:
