[mfw_user_group] Re: Users Group

  • From: Henry Porter <HPorter.sts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "'mfw_user_group@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <mfw_user_group@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 16:36:51 -0000


We would certainly only be interested in matters relating to MFW.  It is
felt that a group solely dedicated to MFW would hold more sway than one
group representing all aspects.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: john.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [SMTP:john.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 12:51 PM
> To:   mfw_user_group@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject:      [mfw_user_group] Users Group
> Hi Everyone!
> I have just received from K3 a 'newsletter' from Andy Makeham which=20=
> mentions the launch of a K3 User Forum=2E
> Now those of you who were at the last Users Group committee meeting
> will=20=
> know that that the idea of a single group for all the different
> product=20=
> users was raised=2E We discussed the matter and there were
> considerable=20=
> differences of opinion as to the desirability of a single group=2E I
> can=20=
> understand that to have 4 or more groups for their various products is
> a=20=
> strain on K3's resources, but most MFW users will not be interested in=20=
> sharing their own time with other groups=2E
> We did decide at the meeting that we would raise the matter at the
> next=20=
> General Meeting (23 May) and get members opinions=2E
> I am a little concerned that it may look as if K3 have jumped the gun
> as=20=
> far as our group is concerned=2E
> What do you think?
> Regards
> John
> John King, Systems Manager
> E-mail: john=2Eking@faireymicrofiltrex=2Eco=2Euk

Other related posts: