[mfw_user_committee] Re: [mfw_user_group] Users Group
- From: "Phillips, Carol" <Carol.Phillips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'mfw_user_committee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <mfw_user_committee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 16:29:05 -0000
John,
I quite agree with you. I believe this is an issue that should be
raised with all the Users Group Members. After all they pay the fees.
Carol
-----Original Message-----
From: Brim, Geoff
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 4:16 PM
To: Phillips, Carol
Subject: FW: [mfw_user_group] Users Group
-----Original Message-----
From: john.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:john.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[SMTP:john.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
<mailto:[SMTP:john.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]>
Sent: 14 February 2001 12:51
To: mfw_user_group@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:mfw_user_group@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [mfw_user_group] Users Group
Hi Everyone!
I have just received from K3 a 'newsletter' from Andy Makeham
which
mentions the launch of a K3 User Forum.
Now those of you who were at the last Users Group committee
meeting will
know that that the idea of a single group for all the different
product
users was raised. We discussed the matter and there were
considerable
differences of opinion as to the desirability of a single group.
I can
understand that to have 4 or more groups for their various
products is a
strain on K3's resources, but most MFW users will not be
interested in
sharing their own time with other groups.
We did decide at the meeting that we would raise the matter at
the next
General Meeting (23 May) and get members opinions.
I am a little concerned that it may look as if K3 have jumped
the gun as far as our group is concerned. What do you think?
Regards
John
John King, Systems Manager
E-mail: john=2Eking@faireymicrofiltrex=2Eco=2Euk
<mailto:john=2Eking@faireymicrofiltrex=2Eco=2Euk>
Other related posts:
- » [mfw_user_committee] Re: [mfw_user_group] Users Group
