[I-M-C] Hello

  • From: "Robert S. Berger, Ph.D." <rsb111@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "met-interactive@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <met-interactive@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:06:38 -0500

Hi Marilyn,

Yes.  We will turn the announcements listserv into the new interactive
listserv, close the one on GoogleGroups, offer those who do not want to be
on interactive an alternative yahoo groups listserv for announcements and
have a return to a listserv that does what we want and does not do what we
do not want.

The freelists listserv has helped clarify this issue.  Very educational.

As to Fun, your advise will be followed to the letter.  I will be in
Chinatown with friends and family this weekend, and I am planning an outing
with friends and family to visit outdoor, public sculptures in Manhattan,
which is inspired by my seeing the following piece next to the West 58th
street theater at which I saw The Artist, a film I recommend.  The piece:


Seeing that sculpture inspired the following associations: "It is an
amazing sculpture.  "It is baying at the moon, which is such an endearing
homage to our unbridled nature.  And it conveys the hope for a responsive
moon that we know cannot happen.  Bay as we may, the moon stays where it is
and we continue to yearn for it.  Surprising analogy for life?"
The word "bay" is right out of Shakespeare.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/bay.  I had rather be a dog, and bay the
moon.  It is from Julius Ceasar:

So I will mark your wOrds.  This email allowed me to complete my research
on pieces for this tour.



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Marilyn Sulzbacker
Date: Tuesday, December 13, 2011
Subject: Hello
To: met-interactive@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

It sounds like we will be switching to yahoo.  When we  send out an
announcement to our members we should probably include what you discovered
about how to backchannel.  I think you should spend some time now doing fun
things.  Thank you for all your hard work

-----Original Message-----
From: Robert S. Berger, Ph.D. <rsb111@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: met-interactive <met-interactive@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tue, Dec 13, 2011 10:20 am
Subject: [I-M-C] Fwd: Hello

I can always turn this one into the new announcement one for those who do
not want interactive.  To be continued!  Robert

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tuesday, December 13, 2011
Subject: Hello
To: met-interactive@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Here, here.

Richard B. Joelson, DSW
110 East 87th Street - Suite 1E
New York, NY 10128
(212) 369-1239
e-mail: RBJoelson@xxxxxxx
please visit:
website: www.richardbjoelsondsw.com
website: www.rbjstorybooksforchildren.com

In a message dated 12/13/2011 9:30:41 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
lisabet991@xxxxxxx writes:


I think Yahoo is a good enough option and this is too much time for you to
spend, especially given this initial glitch about repying to one person.

Let's be simple and stick with yahoo. No one wants you to wear yourself out.

Lisa Beth Miller, LCSW
Office: 43 W 94 St., NY, NY 10025

-----Original Message-----
From: i.m.c.moderators <i.m.c.moderators@xxxxxxxxx>
To: met-interactive <met-interactive@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tue, Dec 13, 2011 8:59 am
Subject: [I-M-C] Fwd: Hello

It looks like the way to back channel is to do a FORWARD and filling the
address you want it to go to.  REPLY and REPLY TO ALL does not work for
back channel.  Robert

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Robert S. Berger, Ph.D.
Date: Tuesday, December 13, 2011
Subject: Hello
To: "i.m.c.moderators@xxxxxxxxx" <i.m.c.moderators@xxxxxxxxx>


I agree with your observation.  Since it allows only a reply to the
listserv we would end up with too many posts that should be back channel

It will take a lot of thought to decide whether to switch to this versus
making the Yahoo one the new interactive and using a different Yahoo one
for those members who do not want to be on the interactive.  Again, I do
not want a mistake made.  Right now I am more inclined toward the Uahoo,
since we know exactly how it works.  It is the one we use for all the other


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jane Gold
Date: Tuesday, December 13, 2011
Subject: Hello
To: met-interactive@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Lisa Beth Miller Miller <Lisabet991@xxxxxxx>, Robert Berger <

Hi Lisa, et al.
Looks good...formatting is preserved on my computer. When I click "reply
all" - it goes to the "met-interactive@xxxxxxxxxxxxx"
but does not go to your individual email address. Maybe not a
problem...maybe it just eliminates the address that is duplicated
in the group address. But it is different and interesting to note.
On Dec 13, 2011, at 6:03 AM, Lisabet991@xxxxxxx wrote:
Just sending this to see if the formatting is maintianed.

Moderators, does this look the way I sent it previously?
*Registration forms with checks for the March 3rd Conference/Workshop will
be accepted at the Holiday Party, by Dr. Robert S. Berger.
Met Chapter

Please Join Us

Other related posts: