[mea] Re: Are you ok with this sentence?
- From: cheri.frazer@xxxxxxxxxx
- To: mea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:17:43 -0600
It's grammatically wrong, but my co-workers are a-ok with it. They're
calling it a "grammatical shortcut."
<ick shiver>
From:
Kirby Gilman <kirby.gilman@xxxxxxx>
To:
mea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date:
2012-01-12 04:14 PM
Subject:
[mea] Re: Are you ok with this sentence?
Sent by:
mea-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sounds off - not sure about grammatically correct or not.
----- Original Message -----
From: Karen McElrea <karenmcelrea@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thursday, January 12, 2012 4:04 pm
Subject: [mea] Re: Are you ok with this sentence?
To: mea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>
> I would object to a sentence of that
> construction, which I believe are incorrect in any context.
>
>
> To: mea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [mea] Are you ok with this sentence?
> From: cheri.frazer@xxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:32:53 -0600
>
> "Burke tore a
> vertebral artery, which are
> located in the neck and supply blood
> to the brainstem ? the back part of the brain which controls
> consciousness."
>
>
> (From http://www.cbc.ca/sports/skiing/story/2012/01/12/sp-burke-
> skiing-injury.html)
>
>
>
> Would you consider that construction
> perfectly ok, a colloquialism / grammatical shortcut, or would
> you consider
> it wrong no matter what?
>
>
>
> Just curious.
>
> -C.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "PLEASE NOTE: The preceding information may be confidential or
> privileged. It only should be used or disseminated for the purpose
> of conducting business with Parker. If you are not an intended
> recipient, please notify the sender by replying to this message and
> then delete the information from your system. Thank you for your
> cooperation."
Other related posts:
