I've seen the repeater/tower site at Dan's rock (I grew up in that area and worked for a two-way radio company that has towers at the Dan's site before moving down this way).
If height/line of sight is your requirement, Dan's Rock is the place. On Oct 6, 2009, at 6:26 PM, Forrester, Pudge wrote:
Thanks for the update Gary,I replaced the Civil Air Patrol Mastr II repeater with a new Motorola unit. The old one has 143.7 or very close to that for the input and 148. 125 or 148.150 output. It is about 5 feet tall. Other than being very dirty from rodents (They had it running without the covers), it was working well right up to the time I took it out of service.This machine does not have to be turned in to the Air Force and can be reassigned to another government agency, but my thinking is to keep it on the CAP asset list at its $100 value. Then I'm hoping the paperwork just gets lost and nobody asks about it in the future.Jim had talked about a repeater on Sideling Hill west of Hancock, however Greg Freis has a free site on Dans Rock west of Cumberland at about 3,000 feet elevation, where the Hams have a 110 foot tower, shack, and power. My Boss and a Dentist bought replacement Rohn 45 sections last winter to get that tower up.God bless, Pudge Systems Administrator Congressman Roscoe Bartlett 2412 RHOB Washington, DC 20515 Phone: 202 225 2721; Fax: 202 225 2193From: mdmars_members-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:mdmars_members- bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of R HENDRICKSONSent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 5:29 PM To: mdmars_members@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: aat3ok@xxxxxxxxx Subject: [mdmars_members] Re: Cascade Repeater Pudge,The Duplexer at Cascade is a standard Motorola 4-can High-Band unit. To set the reject notches on each can, you have to slide the coupling links back and forth to find the null, then set them in place with a thumbnut. Unfortunately, these duplexers have a reputation of not holding the notch very well when subjected to any mechanical vibration or other motion. Just flexing the mounting frame can cause the notch to change. What I think happened to the duplexer tuning is that when the repeater was being carried in Wayne's pick-up truck, the vibration caused the duplexer tuning to get off. It appears to me that the repeater now has a desense problem, possibly due to the duplexer notch tuning being out of alignment.I have the equipment needed to go retune it on site. I have also just finished tuning an old Sinclair 4-cavity duplexer. It has pretty good numbers - 86 dB rejection, and just 1.8 dB insertion loss on the transmit side, and 0.6 dB loss on the receive side. So we can replace the Motorola duplexer with the Sinclair unit - there is room inside the cabinet for the larger Sinclair unit.However, if you can "acquire" a better, more stable, unit, let's go for it! Or perhaps the entire repeater could be used to replace the current machine in DC.Thanks for watching out for us! 73, Gary W3DTN/AAR3EY--- On Tue, 10/6/09, pudgeforrester@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <pudgeforrester@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > wrote:From: pudgeforrester@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <pudgeforrester@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [mdmars_members] Re: Cascade Repeater To: mdmars_members@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Tuesday, October 6, 2009, 2:10 PM Jim, Confidential please.What duplexer does the Cascade repeater have in it? I just took a GE Mastr II out of service at Wheeling CAP and it has a DB products 4 can duplexer in it. I'm quietly "setting" on that repeater in hopes it can be recrystaled and used for MARS in the future.God bless, Pudge