Hi, this is just rumors but they say they are going to revamp the mac book pro 13 inch and make it a ultra-portable notebook. They say it will come with 128 gb of flash storage or either standard SSD drive and no optical drive in it so this will make it lighter and thinner with more mussel than the mac book air. Now like I say this is just rumors as of now. But should know something next year when it comes out . They are just putting things on the chopping block that is just not selling and keeping what most people are buying. This makes good business sense. They chop all the other IOS devices except the iPhone, ipad, iPod touch and the iPod Nano . they revamp the Mac book air and refreshed the mac mini and sure they are going to revamp the mac books pros especially the 13 inch. This then would make sense to get rid of a in-between machine that is not really selling that much. JMO Bubba bubbathegeek@xxxxxxxxx -----Original Message----- From: mac4theblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:mac4theblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Josh de Lioncourt Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 4:54 PM To: mac4theblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [mac4theblind] Re: why have they dis continued the Mac Book? The MacBookAir comes with internal storage ranging from 64GB up to 256GB, if I remember correctly. It is a trade-off that I personally agree with. By using Flash memory instead of a hard disk, you lose some capacity, but gain speed, reliability, and portability. Hard disks are far more prone to failure, run much more slowly, and so on. At this point, there are not very many average users I'd recommend a MacBookPro too, especially if you plan on making it a portable device. The MacBookAir doesn't have a DVD drive, something that few people use on a regular basis anymore. When my older MacBook's DVD drive finally gave up the ghost, I got an external drive to use for a while. In the span of 18 months, I used that external drive exactly once. My next machine will be a MacBookAir, in part because I don't want to lug a DVD drive around that I'm not using. Plus, if you are carrying around a DVD drive, the possibility of its failure is higher, too, due to its moving parts. The storage is really a minor trade-off in comparison to the benefits for the vast majority of users. If you have a lot of data to store, you should have multiple external drives for back up purposes in any case. If you need to access optical discs now and then, you can have an external drive around for that purpose, but won't be forced to carry around with you wherever you go with your Mac. Just my two cents. On Oct 26, 2011, at 4:09 PM, Daniel McGee wrote: Hi all, as I'm not really up on the Mac history it still struck me that why they should discontinue the Mac Book all together. I red or heard somewhere that it was to be replaced by the Mac Book Air and from what I understand you don't get alot of memory on that merchine. Mike Arrigo says on a podcast of his that it is 64GB which is not alot. Im comparison I wonder how much the Mac book had before apple discontinued it. But before I stray off the line my question was why do you and everyone hear I invite people to make there own theories and ideas that apple decided to stop the mac book line. Because as a consumer that was going to be the Mac that I would buy but since that's no longer around then I would proably go for the Mac Book Pro option. Thanks Daniel ************ You are subscribed to the mac4theblind mailing list. The url for this list, where one can unsubscribe or make any changes to their list subscription is: //www.freelists.org/list/mac4theblind The list archive is located at //www.freelists.org/archive/mac4theblind/ All emails intended for the list owner can be sent to: john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx