[m-w] Re: appraiser

  • From: "Dohallow, Sandra" <sandra.dohallow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <m-w@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:36:23 -0600

I agree

Thank you, 

Sandy Dohallow 
Financial Control 
(303)  737-3689 



From: m-w-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:m-w-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Karen Stone
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 1:20 PM
To: m-w@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [m-w] Re: appraiser

I concur!!
> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:13:54 -0600
> Subject: [m-w] Re: appraiser
> From: kathi.pieper@xxxxxxxxx
> To: m-w@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> I think it depends on what the two come back with. If they are close,
> no need to do a third. If they are way off from each other, I would
> think that then we would need a third.
> Kasthi
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Dan Martin
<danandkatrinamartin@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > The appraiser is scheduled to be by the house at 10 am tomorrow.
> > Mike had his brother in law do a market analysis.
> > Do ya'll think we need more than that?
> >
> >
> >


Windows Live(tm) Contacts: Organize your contact list. Check it out.

The information contained in this message and any accompanying attachments may 
contain privileged, private and/or confidential information protected by state 
and federal law.  Penalties may be assessed for unauthorized use and/or 
disclosure.  This message and any attachments are intended for the designated 
recipient only.  If you have received this information in error, please notify 
the sender immediately and return or destroy the information.

This e-mail transmission and any attachments are believed to have been sent 
free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into 
which it is received and opened. It is, however, the recipient's responsibility 
to ensure that the e-mail transmission and any attachments are virus free, and 
the sender accepts no responsibility for any damage that may in any way arise 
from their use.

Other related posts: