[Lugge] [(fwd): Re: Ruby instead of PHP?]

  • From: Arnaudo Massimo <marnaudo@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: Lug Genova <lugge@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 00:25:25 +0100

----- Forwarded message from Jim Freeze <jim@xxxxxxxxxx> -----

Subject: Re: Ruby instead of PHP?
From: Jim Freeze <jim@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: ruby-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 02:36:21 +0900
To: ruby-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (ruby-talk ML), d.werder@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: ruby-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On Wednesday, 18 December 2002 at  2:23:11 +0900, Dominik Werder wrote:
> Hi there,
> I?m new to Ruby and I?d like to know if anybody tried to use Ruby as a 
> replacement to PHP?
> How does it perform in the real world?

 This should probably go to ruby-talk or modruby.net.
 To answer your question, yes, ruby works well as a replacement for PHP.
 In fact, if you use modruby and preload your classes, it is faster than
 php. Search the archives at ruby-talk or modruby. There is a lot of
 info on this.

Jim Freeze
Dimensions will always be expressed in the least usable term.
Velocity, for example, will be expressed in furlongs per fortnight.

----- End forwarded message -----

E impari che puoi davvero sopportare,
che sei davvero forte,
e che vali davvero.
---             ---
HomePage:       http://spazioinwind.iol.it/arnaudo
LinuxGroup:     http://www.lugge.net
 Prima di scrivere in m-list per favore leggi il regolamento 
 Archivio delle e-mail postate in lista 
 Modifica dell'account su freelists 
 Orari di apertura della sede e come arrivarci: 

Other related posts: