Re: performance benchmark results on Julia's benchmark
- From: Elias Barrionovo <elias.tandel@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: luajit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 12:41:52 -0300
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Francesco Abbate
<francesco.bbt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I did actually use the standard Python interpreter (CPython) and the
> program use numpy but if you can give a look to the file by yourself.
> In my point of view it was a quite correct implementation and is not
> surprising that CPython is soooo much slower :-)
Indeed, it's not a surprise that CPython is much slower, but I thought
Numpy would perform better than this, especially considering that it
is growing in the scientific comunity and that it isn't still fully
functional on PyPy. But that's completely off-topic on this list...
Still, glad to know that we have a cool Lua alternative for math stuff. =)
--
NI!
Other related posts:
