RE: Xcb luajit bindings exist?

  • From: William Adams <william_a_adams@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "luajit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <luajit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 14:20:26 +0000

Sorry for that last.&nbsp; I don't now why my browser decided to send
html<br>when I selected plain text as the option...<br><br><br><br><br>&gt;
&lt;br&gt;----------------------------------------&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt; Date: Sun,
23 Aug 2015 19:12:41 +0500&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt; From:
nodir.temir@xxxxxxxxx&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt; To:
luajit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt; Subject: Re: Xcb luajit bindings
exist?&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt; Mike Pall wrote:&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt;
&amp;gt; ... any language that strives to offer&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;
modern I/O capabilities probably ought to have an I/O
multiplexer&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt; and scheduler built into the core, right
from the start.&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt; Mike, what do you think
about Go-lang?&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt; How hard it to be to
implement transpiler from Go to Lua&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt; and support all Go's
features in LuaJIT?&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I had same thought for
Erlang.&amp;nbsp; It seems to be fairly&lt;br&gt;robust in terms of IO and
scheduling.&lt;br&gt;<br>

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. luajit
  3. Archive
  4. 08-2015