On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Alex Szpakowski <aszpakowski@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
it seems some people are seeing this transition simply as an opportunity to
shape an actively used fork of Lua to suit their own whims in lieu of forking
or changing PUC Lua, without much regard to the actual (well-established)
role of LuaJIT. That line of thinking is actively harmful to LuaJIT’s health,
in my opinion.