Re: Moving to Github?

  • From: Dimiter 'malkia' Stanev <malkia@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: luajit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 21:28:06 -0700

I've never had problem from Mike's repo, and I sync very often.
The digest you posted seems to be the current HEAD

E:\p\luajit>git ls-remote
From http://luajit.org/git/luajit-2.0.git
51f05d64c93b5c1e8ba152740012454f399b996d        HEAD
51f05d64c93b5c1e8ba152740012454f399b996d        refs/heads/master
d07df26407484c47d7c0ae7d2678489b1b5d4cc0        refs/tags/v2.0.0-beta1
55b16959717084884fd4a0cbae6d19e3786c20c7        refs/tags/v2.0.0-beta1^{}
5604fb7e0882aff375119585f23e9cfb76a854ba        refs/tags/v2.0.0-beta10
51f05d64c93b5c1e8ba152740012454f399b996d        refs/tags/v2.0.0-beta10^{}
3e30b4475e82211de4ce731f17826d83e31c87a9        refs/tags/v2.0.0-beta2
1d1fed48a002dfc0919135911057ebc255a53e0a        refs/tags/v2.0.0-beta2^{}
7b4f55ad89766c545f7ddea6afdff631a76acde8 refs/tags/v2.0.0-beta2-hotfix2 5287b9326479ea2b7dddd6f642673e58e5a7f354 refs/tags/v2.0.0-beta2-hotfix2^{}
6d14e21b7e8841ff7a31010722d5ece4a6739620        refs/tags/v2.0.0-beta3
09e875519b153bf7bc6fa5e1dbc1cfcdcb1e9aff        refs/tags/v2.0.0-beta3^{}
0f68ef93a76c4fbe1b5ae0e1ebe5be747897204b        refs/tags/v2.0.0-beta4
23189fa40d8cda4fa039a44b1211771b3d34fc7b        refs/tags/v2.0.0-beta4^{}
571758fee1ccbfdffc04059f35ef2760a712d0a9        refs/tags/v2.0.0-beta5
d668373654898d47de56061b4b2b31a1780ce476        refs/tags/v2.0.0-beta5^{}
b2ab0d6d52d2abb39c7b53500bfc967b2990e726        refs/tags/v2.0.0-beta6
97d84111fd38ccd61897c21b05a10bacf4e3c829        refs/tags/v2.0.0-beta6^{}
c54f01de7cf4be6e6db5b9139daed41dfb451acb        refs/tags/v2.0.0-beta7
cfdc356ebe376d9d2d741bae8fd33d1cbdc74f4f        refs/tags/v2.0.0-beta7^{}
d07ecf2c80930b9bfd3b10d38e5616e9c375f3b8        refs/tags/v2.0.0-beta8
9b0c641ac18b560c45173c741c0880fd21fbba60        refs/tags/v2.0.0-beta8^{}
9fcdb096c36cc4a17e403510d4f2b5605ffcf995        refs/tags/v2.0.0-beta8-fixed
29e89adfa74d4c14db67d2a267215e002f03e2ce refs/tags/v2.0.0-beta8-fixed^{}
fc0c13faa4e5037850efd7a1fd2bae5eb6fa6910        refs/tags/v2.0.0-beta9
6ace80c897a8359bedd3f195d126725cb0bf0f8d        refs/tags/v2.0.0-beta9^{}

I'm all for github.com/luajit - but I think it's up to Mike.

On 5/9/2012 7:55 PM, Cedric Vivier wrote:
Hi Mike and all,

First, kudos for the beta10 release! :-)

As I tried to update my tracking repo, it failed probably due to an
upstream rebase and/or luajit.org/git server problem (which happens to
be unresponsive from time to time also).
eg. "error: Unable to find 51f05d64c93b5c1e8ba152740012454f399b996d
under http://luajit.org/git/luajit-2.0.git";

This is not the first time and I happen to occasionally have to
scratch and reclone my repo to be able to track luajit development.
Unfortunately, the mirror at repo.or.cz is not much more reliable and
is very slow to pull from.

I wonder if it would be a good idea to take the opportunity of the
momentum of moving to the new list to also move development over to
github (or at least have the mirror at github rather than repo.or.cz).

Advantages I can see :
- very reliable and fast git infrastructure
- easier to follow luajit changes (even without git)
- easier and more open way to contribute (pull requests)
- optional light issue tracking

Thoughts?



Other related posts: