Re: LuaJIT SciMark Intel/ARM comparison
- From: Justin Cormack <justin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: luajit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 18:50:38 +0000
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 8:52 PM, Mike Pall <mike-1208@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Absolute LuaJIT SciMark scores (higher is better):
>
> 785.4 Intel Core 2 E8400, 3.0 GHz
> 124.7 Intel Atom N270, 1.6 GHz
> 118.4 Asus Transformer Prime, Nvidia Tegra 3, ARM Cortex-A9, 1.3 GHz
> 76.7 HTC EVO 3D, Qualcomm Snapdragon S3, ARM Cortex-A8+, 1.2 GHz
> 32.4 Beagleboard xM, TI DM3730, ARM Cortex-A8, 1.0 GHz
> 27.5 Raspberry Pi, Broadcom BCM2835, ARM 1176JZF-S, 0.7 GHz
>
> LuaJIT SciMark scores weighted by GHz:
>
> 261.8 Intel Core 2 E8400
> 91.1 ARM Cortex-A9
> 77.9 Intel Atom N270
> 63.9 ARM Cortex-A8+
> 39.3 ARM 1176JZF-S
> 32.4 ARM Cortex-A8
>
> A comparison with the Snapdragon S4 or the Exynos line would be
> really interesting.
>
I just got an Exynos, dual 1.7GHz (I think, need to look at uboot a bit
more to confirm)
luajit scimark.lua
Lua SciMark 2010-12-10 based on SciMark 2.0a. Copyright (C) 2006-2010 Mike
Pall.
FFT 136.27 [1024]
SOR 284.21 [100]
MC 88.59
SPARSE 110.33 [1000, 5000]
LU 333.01 [100]
SciMark 190.48 [small problem sizes]
So thats 111 per GHz. Its about 170 on large problem sizes.
Justin
Other related posts:
