Re: LuaJIT 2.0.0 release planning
- From: Tim Caswell <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: luajit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 16:39:06 -0500
I've not had any trouble with the latest luajit code in either luvit
or luv. But I don't have any comprehensive tests either since my
community is still small and growing.
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Geoff Leyland
<geoff_leyland@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 6/10/2012, at 12:06 PM, Mike Pall <mike-1210@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> If you want to help, then now would be a good time to test git
>> HEAD with your applications and report back. Thank you!
>
>
> No problems with:
> - luasimplex: about 30% slower than C implementation
> - heaps: very roughly 10x faster than lua
> - raytrace:
> - no objects takes about 2 1/2 times as long as c
> - with objects, about 6 times as long as c
> - with objects but no allocation sinking is about 20 times as long as c
> - lua takes about 116 times as long as c
> - kdtree: roughly 4 times as fast as lua
> - rough cache oblivious transpose: about 1.5 times as long as c (the
> vanilla transpose is about the same speed)
Other related posts:
